<!--
Please provide as much information as possible about what your PR aims
to do.
PRs with no description will most likely be closed until more
information is provided.
If you're planing on changing fundamental behaviour or add big new
features, please open a GitHub Issue first before starting to work on
it.
If it's not something big and you still want to contact us about it,
feel free to do so !
-->
### Problem description
<!-- Describe the bug that you fixed/feature request that you
implemented, or link to an existing issue describing it -->
### Implementation description
<!-- Explain what you did to correct the problem -->
### Screenshots
<!-- If your change is visual, take a screenshot showing it. Ideally,
make before/after sceenshots -->
### Additional things
<!-- Anything else you would like to say -->
### Problem description
This PR addresses issue #2013 that described a cluttered Event Manager.
This is a DX issue and should not impact the users whatsoever.
### Implementation description
The changes revolve around three main points:
1. the Event Manager (`event_manager.hpp`) was split into four
categories: GUI, Interaction, Lifecycle, and Provider, and two types:
Events, and Requests. This results in the following files:
- `events_gui.hpp`
- `events_interaction.hpp`
- `events_lifecycle.hpp`
- `events_provider.hpp`
- `requests_gui.hpp`
- `requests_interaction.hpp`
- `requests_lifecycle.hpp`
- `requests_provider.hpp`
2. Every event and request now has its own piece of documentation, with
a `@brief`, accompanied by a longer comment if needed, and gets its
`@param`s described.
3. The old `event_manager.hpp` import was removed and replaced by the
correct imports wherever needed, as to reduce spread of those files only
to where they are truly useful.
### Additional things
The commits have been split into (chrono-)logical steps:
- `feat`: split the Event Manager, and replace the imports
- `refactor`, `chore`: make various small changes to match the required
structure
- `docs`: add documentation for events and requests
Hopefully, this will help to review the PR.
*Note: Beware of very long rebuild times in between the commits, use
them sparingly! The Actions will ensure this PR builds anyways*
Closes#2013
---------
Signed-off-by: BioTheWolff <47079795+BioTheWolff@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nik <werwolv98@gmail.com>
This PR adds a test architecture to be able to test plugins
Main infrastructure done by @WerWolv
---------
Co-authored-by: WerWolv <werwolv98@gmail.com>
### Problem description
Currently, the providers use the method `isSavable()` to determine both
if they can use "Save" or "Save as".
This behaviour is problematic because some providers may need to be
saveable but not saveable as: for example the view provider. The
original provider may not allow to be saved.
### Implementation description
I separate these two behaviour by creating another function:
`isDumpable()`, that return true by default but can be overridden by the
provider to return false, if the provider should not be dumped in any
way.
### Additional things
While I was at it, I also marked "export" operations as needing the
"dumpable" flag. That way, we can't accidentally export the whole
address space of a process as base64.
I also added documentation for these some functions in Provider
